[Top-selling item] san francisco 49ers go niners full over printed shirt

there would be no reason for the Board to require san francisco 49ers go niners full over printed shirt “solid justification for its resort to anticipatory photographing.” National Steel & Shipbuilding, supra. As the Board has held, in a different context,

san francisco 49ers go niners full over printed shirt

are too unsophisticated to be bound by what they sign unless expressly told that their act of signing represents something else. In addition to approving the use of cards, of course, san francisco 49ers go niners full over printed shirt Congress has expressly authorized reliance on employee signatures alone in other areas of labor relations, even where criminal sanctions hang in the balance,26 and we should not act hastily in disregarding congressional judgments that employees can be counted on to take responsibility for their acts. Finally, the Respondent, like the employer in Saia, supra, had legitimate safety and trespassing concerns which justified its videotaping of the demonstration. and its videotaping was consistent with the Board’s Rule that the taking of photographs or videotaping to document trespassory

activities for the purpose of making a claim of trespass is lawful.15 In Saia Motor Freight Line, supra, the Board found that the employer was justified in videotaping handbilling activities, which occurred on the employer’s property in its driveway. The Board accepted the employer’s concern about safety and potential negligence liability as a legitimate justification for photographing employees engaged in handbilling. The Board in Saia also pointed out that the employer began its videotaping after the handbilling began and after becoming dissatisfied with police efforts to stop handbillers’ interference with traffic entering its facility. It does not follow, however, that the Board requires that “solid justification” can be established only after specific instances of anticipated problems have occurred. The Board’s rules regarding picture-taking of protected activity do not mean that an employer is precluded from asserting a legitimate concern simply because no disruption has yet occurred. If that were the case,